tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8268346.post6057820118157207122..comments2023-10-30T09:37:03.456-05:00Comments on Vikes Geek: State Claims Offer No Shield for Williamsesvikes geekhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06530336385552424416noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8268346.post-25083827526536266762009-09-12T16:15:39.820-05:002009-09-12T16:15:39.820-05:00"The language of Minn. Stat. 181.938 subd. 3,..."The language of Minn. Stat. 181.938 subd. 3, clearly encompasses collective bargaining agreements, thus making the Williams' second state claim, like their first, seemingly untenable."<br /><br /><br />Ah, I sort of thought you were completely wrong when I read your original post and I was right.<br /><br />What did you base your absolute statements regarding when 301 of the NLRA is preempted? I saw some conflicted rulings when I did my research. I wasn't 100% sure but the Boeing case did seem to lead me to think the Williames would prevail....and they did.....so Geek, where did you get such a strong opinion?Rastakhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18056250693656890319noreply@blogger.com