Saturday, May 26, 2007

Turning Around a Laggard Offense

In 2006, despite making several key additions, jettisoning some dead wood, replacing the head coach, and losing only one player who meant anything at all to the offense in 2005, the Minnesota Vikings' offense ranked near the bottom of the NFL in points scored per game. New head coach Brad Childress blamed the team's failure to convert a "kick ass offense" into points on the learning curve of the new system.

As several often subservient starters revealed, however, the problems with the Vikings' 2006 offense were directly correlated to the predictability of the Vikings' playcalling. No matter the variation of the West Coast the Vikings purported to be running last season, one thing was clear when the dust settled. Running on first down to set up a run on second down to set up the desperation pass on third down behind the sticks is no recipe for offensive success in the NFL.

At least, that was the lesson that most previously unwitting fans of Childressball came to draw. Never one to concede a fault, Childress, however, remains obstinate, convinced that, at the core of things, it was his aged quarterback who was to blame for the team's offensive failures in 2006. Enter Tarvaris Jackson.

Jackson finished an abbreviated 2006 season with more interceptions than touchdown passes, an erratic passing arm, an alarming nervousness in the pocket that would have made Tommy Kramer appear the model of poise under pressure, and a fantasy value entering 2007 that would make Joey Harrington blush. Missing for Jackson in 2007 were the signs of player that the Vikings' consider their franchise quarterback.

To be fair to Jackson, the Vikings offered little in the way of support to the rookie signal caller. The receivers dropped passes, the line failed to protect or block, and the offensive coordinator, well, the offensive coordinator was the very same head coach who pinned his offense's failures on an aged quarterback.

Even if, being as optimistic as one can be given his limited performance to date, one viewed Jackson as the second coming of Michael Vick or a veteran Rich Gannon, the question is what that would get the Vikings? The Vikings' offense will remain stunted without better playcalling that recognizes game situations and that plays to the talent on the field. And even those changes from form will amount to little if the offensive line continues to be one-sided and receivers continue to drop easy passes.

Last year, the Vikings' offensive talent included Jermaine Wiggins, a player relegated to near non-existent status under Childress in 2006 after leading the Vikings in receptions over a two-year period from 2004-2005. It also included a red zone threat in Marcus Robinson, known for hauling in corner-of-the-endzone lob passes, but given virtually no opportunity to do so in 2006. And it included a speedy, pass-receiving running back in Mewelde Moore, who was relegated to third-string for much of 2006, despite fitting to a 'T' the mold of a West Coast running back. Of the three, only Moore remains, and in an uncertain role. Yet to be filled are the holes left by the jettisoned Robinson and Wiggins.

Changes

While fans rightfully lament the Vikings' failure to sign an offensive lineman capable of playing right guard or right tackle and legitimately bemoan the team's slew of mediocre wide receivers, the team is not entirely bereft of options either at offensive line or at receiver. On the roster are two players who could make a considerable difference in these two areas, if only the coaching staff would allow.

The Vikings' current starting offense is as follows: Tarvaris Jackson (QB), Adrian Peterson (RB), Tony Richardson (FB), Bryant McKinnie (LT), Steve Hutchinson (LG), Matt Birk (C), Artis Hicks (RG), Ryan Cook (RT), Jim Kleinsasser (TE), Troy Williamson and Bobby Wade (WR).

With strenghts at running back, left guard, center, and (blocking) tight end, the Vikings are still soft at left tackle, weak at right tackle and right guard, below league average at wide receiver, and certain at quarterback only in that even a vastly improved Jackson will not be able to do much if the Vikings' offensive line doesn't block, receivers do not catch the ball, and the offensive play callers don't adjust their thinking.

That's a lot of 'ifs' for one offense. But at least two of those 'ifs' could be helped along greatly by three adjustments to personnel. The most obvious of the three is to get Moore into the offense game plan. With good hands and quick moves, Moore was saddled in 2006 by a coaching staff disinterested in his abilities and content on relying on Chester Taylor to run the ball. With a need at receiver, however, Moore would offer a nice option in Childress' short-passing game and might be just the player to convert third-and-sixes into first downs rather than last year's fourth-and-twos. If used properly, he might even help avert the Vikings' now routine third-and-six dilemma.

A second change that the Vikings could make to improve their offense in 2006 is to rely less on a fullback and more on two running backs. Lining up Peterson and Taylor in the backfield would give the Vikings more power out of the backfield than they ever had last year with a good blocker in Taylor still capable of pounding out yards. The move to a Peterson and Taylor tandem in the backfield would limit Richardon's playing time in the backfield but need not limit his playing time, because...

The Vikings still are without a solid plan on the right side of the offensive line. For the past two seasons, the team has thrown rookies and otherwise overwhelmed players into the right guard and right tackle spots and crossed its collective fingers. The gimmick has not worked. Artis Hicks looked competent only by way of comparison with his utterly awful predecessors, Mike Rosenthal and Jason Whittle. And nobody has come close to looking good at right tackle.

The Vikings' solution to the team's right-side woes the past two years has been to keep Kleinsasser on the line to help block. At 6-3, 275 pounds, Kleinsasser is both large enough and quick enough to block defensive ends and blitzing safeties and corners. And, as he has demonstrated, he is certainly more dependable as a blocker than are the alternatives that the Vikings currently have at right tackle or right guard, and he is more of a blocker than he is a tight end.

Converting Kleinsasser to right tackle would allow Kleinsasser to play essentially the same role that he has played the past two seasons with Minnesota. And, as that would open up a slot at tight end, it would allow the Vikings to slide blocking back Richardson into the tight end position, thus having a tight end who not only can block, but who also can catch and run after the catch.

The changes to the offense would result in the following starting lineup: Jackson (QB), Peterson and Taylor (RB), Troy Williamson/Bobby Wade and Mewelde Moore (WR), Tony Richardson (TE), Bryant McKinnie (LT), Steve Hutchinson (LG), Matt Birk (C), Artis Hicks/Marcus Johnson/Road Kill (RG), and Jim Kleinsasser (RT). The changes not only would produce a more efficient line and a more lethal backfield and wide-receiving corps, it also would allow Jackson to learn on the run---literally.

With a better offensive line and a two-headed running game, the Vikings could allow Jackson to use his legs more while he adjusted to reading and reacting to pass defenses and worked out the kinks in his passing game. Relying, initially, on safer, short routes to Moore, his running backs, and his speed would open up deeper passing options without subjecting Jackson to complicated defenses.

A veteran offensive guard, quarterback, and receiver with some gas left in the tank would look good in Minnesota next year. But, if the team is going to move ahead with the players currently on the roster, some modest changes in where players play could do wonders for what has been an anemic offense. Of course, the implication is that Childress not only would be open to changes in player positioning, but also in meaningful changes to his playcalling. At this point, neither assumption looks all that promising.

Up Next: Defensive changes. Plus, around the league.

11 comments:

pjw said...

"thus having a tight end who not only can block, but who also can catch and run after the catch."

Seems I am in error.
I thought there was a team rule that tight ends play London Bridge and all fall down after a catch.

vikingageguy said...

You have a great blog Vikes Geek. Want to exchange links with my new Vikings blog The Viking Age, which is part of the justthefans network? Here it is:

http://thevikingage.com

bob said...

You forgot to mention our starting TE, Visanthe Shiancoe. I know he's a relatively unknown commodity to fans, but the scouts and coaches thought enough of him to sign him to a pretty good deal and it seems likely that he's going to be our starting TE this year. I wouldn't be against moving Kleinie to RT from time to time, but I think Cook was on the right path last year and should be given the opportunity to develop more.

And, while it would be exciting to see both Chester and Peterson on the field together, I think that will be a limited formation next season, because Richardson is just too valuable to have riding the bench. But even just rotating our two backs in for each other will keep them fresh and mix it up for the defenses we face, if the coaches are smart enough to recognize when one of them has the hot hand and to ride him for a while.

King Richard said...

I have to kindly disagree. Mount Mckinnie is a solid player. And Tony Richardson is one of the best fullbacks in the league. I would have to agree that the right side of our line is suspect at best. But I do not think moving Kleinsasser to the line would be a good move.

Anonymous said...

King Richard,

While I agree with your general assessment of Richardson, if you don't need a fullback, Richardson is expendable in the backfield. As for Kleinsasser, putting him at tackle wouldn't be much of a move as he has virtually manned the position anyway for the past two seasons.

VG

Anonymous said...

PJW,

I believe that rule will still be in effect in 2007, but the Vikings purportedly are willing to waive the rule for Richardson, as per a stipulation in Richardson's contract.

VG

Anonymous said...

Bob,

It would be nice if Cook showed something this year. But that would still leave a hole at right guard.

In Rick Spielman's words, Shianco is a player "on the come"--a term to be more specifically defined at a later date.

VG

Anonymous said...

Moore at WR, Richardson at Tight End, Kleinsasser at Tackle??? Positions these guys never played before in their careers. And it can be done this year. LOL, please these paper moves you are suggesting would only work in Madden football, not in the NFL.

Dave said...

So VG, I see you've fallen for the old "offensive coordinator turned head coach" trick. You must think that our Kick Ass Offensive System (K.A.O.S) is a little out of CONTROL. Well, you missed by that much. You must think it's time to "86" the whole thing, do you? Yes, this team will be a Super Bowl winner this year with the players we have and a great system. Would you believe a playoff winner? How about a .500 team with delusions of grandeur? I think it could be cured with a new CHIEF or at least having BC make better use of the Cone of Silence during games. Okay, maybe I should GET SMART and hope somebody with a little imagination gets to call plays this year.

Just kidding, I guess I've overdone my Don Adams/Barbara Feldon tribute. Good article.

Tom said...

I have to say I don't really agree with this article at all sorry to say. While I have no expectations of winning the superbowl, I believe Jackson looked much better than his numbers have shown...research also shows great QB's have to learn and therefore are not all stars their first few games/seasons.

Tom said...

I also disagree with converting Moore to WR and not utilizing Sidney Rice or Audre (sp?) Allison in the WR slot. Bobby Wade, Troy Williamson, and Sidney Rice should be the starting 3 at WR and should be an upgrade over last years WR core. Wade appears to be excellent at catching, and not afraid to take a hit over the middle. Williamson appears to be doing what he can to fix the dropsies, and Sidney Rice has speed and solid hands.

Peterson and Taylor in the backfield together will work at times, but alternating will work just fine, they both are great players, and I hope the Vikes utilize them equally as much.

Ryan Cook did look solid in his time on the right side of the line, I believe he will eventually flourish into a solid G.

So, in short, I think that most of your changes would not work, and would not utilize players that the Vikes are certainly going to use.